Rather, Machiavelli was demonstrating, through reasoned analysis based on numerous historical examples, that the most effective way to govern a population is through decision-making based on the current situation without muddying up the waters with considerations of morality. Holy snickerdoodles that's amoral!!
Table of Contents Overview Machiavelli composed The Prince as a practical guide for ruling though some scholars argue that the book was intended as a satire and essentially a guide on how not to rule. The Prince is not particularly theoretical or abstract; its prose is simple and its logic straightforward.
The Prince is concerned with autocratic regimes, not with republican regimes. The first chapter defines the various types of principalities and princes; in doing so, it constructs an outline for the rest of the book. Chapter III comprehensively describes how to maintain composite principalities—that is, principalities that are newly created or annexed from another power, so that the prince is not familiar to the people he rules.
Machiavelli offers practical advice on a variety of matters, including the advantages and disadvantages that attend various routes to power, how to acquire and hold new states, how to deal with internal insurrection, how to make alliances, and how to maintain a strong military. This premise is especially true with respect to personal virtue.
Certain virtues may be admired for their own sake, but for a prince to act in accordance with virtue is often detrimental to the state. Similarly, certain vices may be frowned upon, but vicious actions are sometimes indispensable to the good of the state.
Machiavelli combines this line of reasoning with another: Thus, the appearance of virtue may be more important than true virtue, which may be seen as a liability. The final sections of The Prince link the book to a specific historical context: Machiavelli sets down his account and explanation of the failure of past Italian rulers and concludes with an impassioned plea to the future rulers of the nation.Jun 22, · THE PRINCE BY NICCOLO MACHIAVELLI | ANIMATED BOOK REVIEW FightMediocrity.
Niccolò Machiavelli RICH DAD POOR DAD BY ROBERT KIYOSAKI ANIMATED BOOK REVIEW - Duration. Feb 10, · A breif review of the main arguments put forth in "The Prince." My conclusion of the book is that Machiavelli is misunderstood.
People consider him a . But it makes great sense for him to translate Machiavelli: both are contrarians, interested in portraying the world as it is, not as others would like it to be.
Sep 28, · Niccolo Machiavelli was born in Florence on 3rd May The second son of Bernardo di Nicolo Machiavelli, a lawyer of some repute, and of Bartolommea di Stefano Nelli, his wife.
Both parents were members of the old Florentine nobility and Machiavelli would follow in his family's line of service to Florence, but much more importantly to the idea of a united Italy. of their prince, than new ones. The reason is that in such states it is sufficient only for the prince to maintain the customs of those who ruled before him, and to deal carefully with circumstances as they arise.
In this way a prince of average powers can maintain himself in his state unless he loses it by some extraordinary and excessive force.
Along these lines, after Machiavelli wrote THE PRINCE and before he published it, he wrote a small work entitled “The Life of Castruccio Castracani of Lucca” that illustrated the importance of caution and diplomacy instead of endless conquests.